Yes, that is my point. Dioneo used Salza's account. That's against the codex. Hence the investigation, and +C uncovering more instances of the accounts being used by Dioneo, rather than the person who originally owned the accounts.kunimura wrote:I don't say that Dioneo wrote this add from his account, i said salza asked him to wrote this add from her account (not his account). They two aren't speak english very well and they can't wrote it correct. Dioneo meaned copy - overwrite the something that I wrote on pice of paper
From the codex:
Instead of banning Dioneo's account, it received jail tasks instead.Type D: Dual clienting
Dual clienting is immediatelly treated as a heavy violation. Each account may be used only by the owner. There is no "I just hopped for a second on his/her account to check something" excuse. We have sophisticated methods of finding and proving this, so as long as each person only plays with his/her own account, there's nothing to worry about. When found:
1st time: All secondary accounts are immediatelly permanently banned without question. Doesn't help if it was you're relative's or friend's account, the fact that you used it makes it your secondary account. Your main account is temporarily banned for a few weeks or months, although it may also be a permanent ban. We may permanently impound any posessions that we believe were obtained using the benefit of two accounts, even with just a hunch and no proof.
2nd time: Permanent ban.
My main point in all of this is that +C is careful, and thorough. His decision isn't going to - and should not - change based on what is claimed by the parties involved.
